logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

More Issues In the News

SearchRSS Feed

Observer - 06/09/2006

Bill shuts data theft loophole

By John Fuquay

RALEIGH — Consumers are to be notified by businesses, such as banks, when personal information is lost; and a bill in the General Assembly would add the same requirement to governments.

The bill passed in the House last year but did not clear a Senate committee until last week. It could be heard by the full Senate this week.

Prompted in part by a recent theft of military records, the bill would require disclosure by governments whenever someone’s Social Security number, account number, password or other sensitive identifying information is compromised.

The bill strengthens a 2005 law that requires businesses to notify customers of potential identity theft. If passed, the law would apply to local and state agencies, such as the N.C. Department of Revenue, local motor vehicle offices, cities and schools.

State Attorney General Roy Cooper has pushed for mandatory disclosure laws. While most governmental agencies say they don’t mind disclosing potential identity theft, there was no requirement.

The U.S. Veterans Administration recently disclosed that information about more than 26 million retired and active duty military personnel had been stolen. But the theft was kept quiet for weeks.

“Government should have to play by the same rules as business when it comes to protecting personal information,” state Attorney General Roy Cooper said in a statement. “Consumers deserve to know when their information has been lost or stolen and could fall into the hands of an identity thief.”

The identity theft law of 2005 seeks to minimize the use of Social Security numbers as identification numbers, allows consumers to prohibit release of the credit history, and requires business to protect a consumer’s personal information. The bill did not address government offices.

“I think it’s good that we’re closing this loophole,” said Rob Thompson, director of the N.C. Public Interest Research Group, an independent advocacy organization. “We shouldn’t assume that governments would make that same disclosure businesses do.”

Cooper’s spokeswoman, Noelle Talley, said governments weren’t included a year ago because breaches by private companies were considered more urgent. She said a data-processing company had planned to limit notification of a breach to its its California customers because it was the only state that required notification.

“We’ve since seen that government is not immune to this problem,” Talley said.

Social Security numbers have been used as identifying numbers for many years. Some states used the numbers on drivers’ licenses, and, in some cases, they remain available.

‘Security breach’

Thompson said he is concerned about an “ongoing security breach” with Social Security numbers available from the N.C. Secretary of State’s Web site. He said about 500,000 such numbers are available with business registration information.

Liz Proctor, a spokeswoman for the Secretary of State, said the office is seeking a one-year extension in the bill to allow time to redact the numbers.

“We don’t ask for those numbers, but some of the forms sent in do have it,” Proctor said. “What we’ve been trying to do as new forms come in, is go in and redact that before they’re scanned onto the Web site. It’s a public document, so we can’t really change it. The issue is, we still have 2 million older filings.”

State Rep. Margaret Dickson, a Fayetteville Democrat who co-sponsored the bill last year, said she was not aware of the Secretary of State’s use of the numbers, and hopes it can be corrected.

“Sometimes our technology makes possible things we couldn’t have imagined before,” she said. “It wasn’t too long ago that universities in North Carolina used a Social Security number as a student’s ID number. Circumstances change, and we have to adapt.”

SEARCH THIS SITE